Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2985 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $42.85 vs $255.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-10900KF - $0.28 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - 195 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |