Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3599 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $42.85 vs $161.76
- Up to 67% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-12400 - $0.19 vs $0.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 29% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 285 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7201 minutes ago
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |