Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 204 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $39.9 vs $161.76
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400 - $0.23 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10584 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |