Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 765 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $39.9 vs $130.73
- Up to 68% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-8400 - $0.34 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 122 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |