Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 356 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 68% better in Elden Ring than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 57 vs 34 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
20%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
