Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 262 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 38 vs 34 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
