Key Differences
In short — Iris Pro Graphics 6200 outperforms Radeon HD 7730M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is 864 days newer than Radeon HD 7730M.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Radeon HD 7730M - 34 vs 33 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon HD 7730M - 15 vs 25 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon HD 7730M
Mobile • Apr 24th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon HD 7730M
Mobile • Apr 24th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
21.6 GTexel/s
40%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon HD 7730M |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2012 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | London |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | None |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Mobile |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 575 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 675 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
