Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 129 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 15 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 78% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 66 vs 37 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
29%
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |