Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 3 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 12% better in Dota 2 than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 160 vs 143 FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
51%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
