Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 332 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 15 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 5% better in Lost Ark than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 173 vs 165 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
41%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
