Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 204 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 40 vs 35 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
89%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
