Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Radeon R7 250X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 and Radeon R7 250X have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R7 250X - 40 vs 37 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250X - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 80 vs 150 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Radeon R7 250X
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 265 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $99 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 900 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 950 MHz |
| 925 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
