Key Differences
In short — Iris Pro Graphics 6200 outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is 259 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 15 vs 55 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
48%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
