Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 155 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 15 vs 19 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 129% better in Elden Ring than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 78 vs 34 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |