Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 270 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 270 is 296 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 136 vs 129 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 270
Desktop • Nov 13th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
71%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
