Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R9 270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 652 days newer than Radeon R9 270.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 150 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 35% better in World of Tanks than Radeon R9 270 - 161 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 4 vs 2 GB
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 270
Desktop • Nov 13th, 2013
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R9 270 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$179 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 256-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 900 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 925 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
