Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R9 280X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 688 days newer than Radeon R9 280X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Radeon R9 280X - 86 vs 75 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 175 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 4 vs 3 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$649 | MSRP | $299 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR5 |
4096-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |