Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R7 265 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 560 days newer than Radeon R7 265.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 77% better in Starfield than Radeon R7 265 - 23 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 150 vs 175 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $649 | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| HBM | Type | GDDR5 |
| 4096-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
