Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 185 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 8% better in Dota 2 than Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - 155 vs 143 FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
50%
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |