Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3550 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3550 is 932 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Performs up to 0% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-6200 - 297 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18530 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |