Buy on Amazon
$34.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 518 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W3550 - 116 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
