Buy on Amazon
$49.37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 1758 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W3550 - 117 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $49.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
