Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4531 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon W3550 - 298 vs 274 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |