Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1963 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 19% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 200 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $173.99 vs $232.12
- Up to 37% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.87 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
168
84%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
63.04347826086957%
Price, $
$232.12
74%
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$173.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $173.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
44.40816326530612%
Multi-Core
3898
33.056309362279514%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |