Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 851 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 260 vs 254 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $223.0 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76523 minutes ago
Buy for $223 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
65.1497005988024%
Multi-Core
3898
54.98659895612922%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |