Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13500 is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $232.12 vs $243.99
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 14% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 387 vs 338 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.63 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
338
87.33850129198967%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
91.30434782608697%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44062 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
387
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$243.99
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $243.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
45.276737411568874%
Multi-Core
3898
31.572979102543336%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |