Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - $136.62 vs $204.0
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 79% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 247 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.83 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
247
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$204
66%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |