Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $136.62 vs $140.0
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 218% better in Cities: Skylines II than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 54 vs 17 FPS
- Up to 68% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $2.59 vs $8.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |