Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 355 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 181 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $120.0 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77142 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
84.14539829853055%
Multi-Core
3898
94.15458937198068%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |