Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $136.62 vs $138.98
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 123 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.13 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.98
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |