Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 20 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 187 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $103.0 vs $136.62
- Up to 27% better value when playing Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.55 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8831 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |