Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1730 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 234 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $115.99 vs $136.62
- Up to 19% better value when playing Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.5 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |