Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $136.62 vs $143.7
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 805 vs 742 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
805
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.7
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |