Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $124.0 vs $136.62
- Up to 11% better value when playing Stray than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.67 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |