Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6800K - 188 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $103.0 vs $115.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11400F - $0.61 vs $0.62 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
98%
Price, $
$115.99
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
170
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |