Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 222 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $123.59 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76961 minutes ago
Buy for $123.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
76.08391608391608%
Multi-Core
3898
71.01475678629987%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |