Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 188 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - $0.66 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $122.03 vs $124.5
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.5
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2499 minutes ago
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2498 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |