Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 2114 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $136.62 vs $179.79
- Up to 12% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.56 vs $0.64 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 16% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 283 vs 245 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
245
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Buy for $179.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |