Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 1112 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 138 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $210.99 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76516 minutes ago
Buy for $210.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
64.18879056047197%
Multi-Core
3898
45.869616380324786%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |