Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $232.12 vs $282.99
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Saints Row than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 180 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76533 minutes ago
Buy for $282.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
42.800944138473646%
Multi-Core
3898
26.19447617767623%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |