Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2290 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 227 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $230.77 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76525 minutes ago
Buy for $230.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76524 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
39.606843829632325%
Multi-Core
3898
25.287058060330846%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |