Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $232.12 vs $316.71
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 243 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77134 minutes ago
Buy for $316.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
40.886884629838406%
Multi-Core
3898
25.18901453957997%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |