Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1599 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 472 vs 321 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $199.0 vs $232.12
- Up to 42% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.42 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
321
68.00847457627118%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, $
$232.12
85%
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
472
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
49.95408631772268%
Multi-Core
3898
37.981097145084284%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |