Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 191 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $207.95 vs $232.12
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.09 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
87.43455497382199%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
78.41726618705037%
Price, $
$232.12
89%
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$207.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $207.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
67.4937965260546%
Multi-Core
3898
53.90679020882312%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |