Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1730 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 180 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $175.0 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77116 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
49.77127172918573%
Multi-Core
3898
45.4365310642266%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |