Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14600K is 2675 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $232.12 vs $235.6
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Halo Infinite than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 177 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.33 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
158
89.26553672316385%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
90.47619047619048%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1924 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.6
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $235.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
38.77405559515324%
Multi-Core
3898
24.23074532230994%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |