Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2290 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $150.71 vs $319.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i7-13700K - $0.32 vs $0.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 16% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 552 vs 475 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
475
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2181 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
552
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
55%
Price, $
$319.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |