Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 595 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - 508 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 39% cheaper than Pentium G3250 - $37.0 vs $61.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing World of Tanks than Pentium G3250 - $0.07 vs $0.12 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16882 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16882 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |