Key Differences
In short — Core i7-940XM outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-940XM is 617 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 55 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Clarksfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |