Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3440 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-940XM - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-940XM - 35 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Athlon |
Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |